If you find any of this useful, please consider donating via PayPal to help keep this site going.

Email news@statisticool.com to sign up to receive news and updates

Third Person Singular Pronoun Problem


The issue is, the English language has no agreed upon choice of pronoun for gender-neutral, third-person singular nouns that refer to people. Do we use he, she, they, it, one, thon (yes this was proposed once as "that one"), "he or she", "him or her", "his or hers", "himself or herself", "he/she", "(s)he", "s/he", "hse", "him/her", "his/her", "himself/herself" or something else? Note that besides being clunky, the writer still has the choice of which pronoun to place first in some of these variations like "him or her" or "he/she". Personally, I vote for just using "he", but I am biased, since I grew up using it and I am male, and for both of those reasons it just seems natural, even though I know it has issues. However, this is a very interesting issue that concerns fairness, bias, feminism, LGBTQ communities, non-binary gender, and has a fascinating history. Here is my statistician attempt at a solution to solve this problem two ways: randomness and symbols.

We could simply randomly select from the words {he, she} and use that method as needed throughout a document. Therefore, over time, generic "he" and "she" instances would appear with roughly equal frequency, and we eliminate bias. Because the world is digital now, and printed books are less and less, randomizing elements of a text is quite simple to do. Companies like Microsoft can add this option to Microsoft Word, for example. More on that later.

If we want to use more "she", since "he" has historically been used more, we can do that too by sampling using weights, and we would just give more weight to "she" being selected. For example, randomly sampling "she" five times more often than "he". Your vector of words to sample from would be {"he", "she", "she", "she", "she", "she"}. Of course, the opposite could be done too, for example in talking about traditionally or stereotypically female occupations like nursing.

We could also tabulate the percentage of "he" and "she" when used generically in, say, publications to gauge existing bias to help in setting how much to bias things in the fair direction moving forward. Perhaps setting the percents based on the "sex at birth ratio" for a country? Perhaps base the percents on the genders of the contributors to a publication or genders in an occupation? Not sure here, but in any case the option is easily there.

Note that we could also sample from {he, she, they}, or {he, she, they, any other option(s)} too.

Let's look at a few examples of this idea in action. You can refresh the webpage to see the changes, bolded for easy spotting.

Before (static)

After (dynamic)

View the source of this webpage to see the Javascript code to do this. Note, the last example kept track of the first generic choice for use in additional text, that is, "he" links with "his" and "she" links with "her".

Another possible way this could be partially solved, is to use a symbol for the idea "he or she". For example, here "H" is overlayed with with "S" and "h" is overlayed with "s" (a graphic designer could make this look better). To me each looks like a "b" (for "binary"?), but with a yin-yang squiggle through it, indicating, perhaps, that the border between choices isn't so clear-cut. Or maybe I'm reading too much into it. In any case, the letters "h" in "he" and "sh" in "she" would be replaced by the symbol. How to pronounce the word would then be up to the individual reader, sort of a "fielder's choice". Then, maybe someone could extend this symbol idea to "his or her" and other situations.

another possibility

After (symbol version)

Here is a Visual Basic macro I made for use (and please edit as needed) in Word. In your Word document, you'd just type a "*he" for a generic "he or she", and then run the macro for each occurrence to randomly fill in with "he" or "she".

To use the macro with the {"he", "she", "she", "she", "she", "she"} example, you'd just change the .5, or 50%, to .833 or 5/6.

Thanks for reading.

Please anonymously VOTE on the content you have just read:


If you enjoyed any of my content, please consider supporting it in a variety of ways:

AFFILIATE LINK DISCLOSURE: Some links included on this page may be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the affiliate link provided I may receive a small commission (at no additional charge to you). Thank you for the support!